Home > World > US > Trump’s Deportation Gamble Collapses: Court Says No “Invasion,” But What Comes Next?

Trump’s Deportation Gamble Collapses: Court Says No “Invasion,” But What Comes Next?

Fifth Circuit ruled Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members unlawful, stressing the law applies only during wartime. Advocates hailed it as a constitutional victory.

Published By: Shairin Panwar
Last Updated: September 4, 2025 04:23:23 IST

A US federal appeals court has shut down Donald Trump’s bid to invoke the centuries-old Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans suspected of gang activity as unlawful and outside presidential authority.

Fifth Circuit Strikes Down Trump’s Claim of “Invasion”

In a 2-1 decision, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration’s March proclamation. The proclamation had tried to invoke the 1798 law to expel purported members of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang.

Judge Leslie Southwick, author of the majority opinion, stated that there was no justification for Trump’s assertion of a “predatory incursion” on US territory, a need to invoke the law outside time of war. The Alien Enemies Act has been utilized only three times in US history in the War of 1812 and the two World Wars.

Legal Advocates Call It a “Victory for Rule of Law”

Civil rights attorneys and groups welcomed the decision as a vital curb on presidential power. The ACLU, which is representing the Venezuelans arrested in Texas, contended that the administration applied a law of war during times of peace to avoid judicial scrutiny.

Senior ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt stated, “The court correctly rejected the administration’s perception that it can declare an emergency without accountability. This is a vital check on our democracy.”

The Brennan Center for Justice and the Cato Institute also had their say, stating the law was never meant for peacetime enforcement of immigration. Katherine Yon Ebright of the Brennan Center called the ruling “a victory for checks and balances” and a rebuke to “baseless national security claims.”

ALSO READ: How Did a British Heiress Become the Heart of a Sex Trafficking Ring? The Woman Behind Epstein’s Dark Web

Political and Community Pushback

Democrats, including Senator Dick Durbin, have hailed the ruling, emphasizing that Trump’s invocation of antique wartime laws endangered constitutional freedoms. Latino advocacy organizations like Voto Latino argued that attacking immigrant communities under those laws was both “unlawful and unjust.”

Maria Teresa Kumar of Voto Latino cautioned, “Policies like these erode due process and expand executive power without accountability. If unchecked, they could bleed into the rights of every American.”

The Trump administration can petition for a rehearing before the entire Fifth Circuit, but legal analysts predict the case will ultimately be decided by the US Supreme Court.

Latest News

The Daily Guardian is India’s fastest
growing News channel and enjoy highest
viewership and highest time spent amongst
educated urban Indians.

Follow Us

© Copyright ITV Network Ltd 2025. All right reserved.

The Daily Guardian is India’s fastest growing News channel and enjoy highest viewership and highest time spent amongst educated urban Indians.

© Copyright ITV Network Ltd 2025. All right reserved.