Hardeep Singh Kohli, a comedian and ex-Big Brother contestant, is accused of sexually assaulting three women between 2007 and 2016. Accusations of unwanted physical contact and sexual remarks are among the charges.
Because of Kohli’s profile and the alleged incidents that took place on BBC property, the issue has garnered public attention. All six charges are denied by Kohli. The trial is set for November and will hear multiple witnesses.
Allegations Against Kohli
At Glasgow Sheriff Court, prosecutors outlined allegations that span almost a decade. One incident reportedly took place at BBC Scotland’s headquarters at Pacific Quay, Glasgow. Kohli allegedly grabbed a woman’s buttocks and hugged her without consent.
ALSO READ: UK Homelessness Minister Quits After Evicting Tenants And Hiking Rent By £700
Further accusations include Kohli allegedly touching the same woman’s back and hair at Glasgow’s Radisson Blu Hotel. Another charge involves a second woman at Cross Keys Hotel in Canonbie, Dumfries and Galloway, where Kohli allegedly seized her arm, lunged towards her, and tried to kiss her face. Kohli’s defence has lodged a special defence of consent on this charge.
In a separate incident, Kohli allegedly assaulted a third woman at the former Yes Bar in Glasgow city centre. He is accused of hugging her, seizing her, and kissing her on the mouth. In addition, he faces charges of disorderly conduct and breach of peace linked to the same occasion.
Court Preparations & Trial Outlook
Kohli’s lawyer, Urfan Dar, confirmed the defence is ready for trial. The hearing is expected to last four to five days. The prosecution will call seven civilian witnesses and one police witness to support its case.
The judge, Sheriff John McCormick, has set the trial for November and has allowed Kohli to remain on bail pending proceedings.
ALSO READ: Why are Two ‘Zara’ Ads Banned in UK?
Spotlight on Media Industry’s Handling of Misconduct
This instance questions the behavior in the workplace, particularly in media industry. Concerns over safety & accountability in media organizations are still present. It encourages a more extensive conversation on how media organizations safeguard employees and guests from abuse and harassment.
Moreover, the involvement of a well-known media figure highlights the challenges victims face in coming forward when allegations target public figures. The case may encourage more institutions to review policies on misconduct and establish clearer mechanisms for complaints.
