A Pakistani military court sentenced 25 civilians to prison terms ranging from two to ten years in connection with the violent attacks on military facilities in May 2023. The protests followed the arrest of former Prime Minister Imran Khan by paramilitary soldiers, leading thousands of his supporters to storm military installations and set fire to a general’s house. The violence resulted in at least eight deaths.
Court’s Ruling and Reactions
The military’s media wing called the sentences an “important milestone in the dispensation of justice,” but not all are in agreement. Critics argue that military courts lack the transparency, independence, and due process needed for fair trials.
US Concerns
The United States expressed concern about the lack of judicial independence in the military court’s decision. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller emphasized the importance of upholding the right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by Pakistan’s constitution.
Political Reactions
Richard Grenell, a former aide to President Donald Trump, criticized the US response, calling it “too little and too weak” and demanded the release of Imran Khan. Congressman Ro Khanna echoed this sentiment, calling for new democratic elections in Pakistan.
Zalmay Khalilzad, a former US envoy to Afghanistan, urged the US to pressure Pakistan’s military to reach a political agreement with Khan’s party, PTI, and facilitate his release.
The Path Forward
As Pakistan faces mounting international scrutiny, the case underscores growing concerns over the role of military courts and the fairness of the political system in the country. The future of Imran Khan and Pakistan’s democratic process remains uncertain.
