Categories: Viral News

‘Predictive Programming’ or Eerie Coincidence? Viral Claims Link Charlie Kirk Assassination to 1998 Film ‘Snake Eyes’

Social media users are drawing unverified parallels between Charlie Kirk's assassination and the 1998 film Snake Eyes, citing similarities in names, the victim's wound, and dates.

Published by
Prakriti Parul

In the wake of the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, a wave of online speculation has drawn unsettling parallels between the real-world tragedy and the 1998 political thriller Snake Eyes. Social media users are pointing to a series of eerie similarities in names, dates, and events, with some labeling it a "coincidence" and others alleging "predictive programming." These assertions are still completely unsubstantiated and unbacked by official sources, even though they have gone viral.

What is the Movie 'Snake Eyes' About?

Nicolas Cage plays Rick Santoro in Snake Eyes, which was directed by Brian De Palma. Rick is a crooked police officer who looks into a conspiracy after the U.S. Secretary of Defense is killed during a big boxing bout.The movie is a fictional story about a high-level political murder that takes place in a packed arena and how the investigation reveals a network of corruption.

Also Read: How a ‘Daily Habit’ Could Be Doubling Your Cardiovascular Disease Risk | Cardiologist Warns

What Specific Similarities Are Users Highlighting?

On sites like X, users have painstakingly assembled a list of coincidences that they believe are too important to overlook. Among the primary points of comparison are:

The Victim's Name: In the film, the assassinated official is named Charles Kirkland. The real-life victim was Charles James "Charlie" Kirk. The shared first name and similarity between "Kirk" and "Kirkland" form the cornerstone of the comparison.

  • The Nature of the Attack: Secretary Kirkland is shot in the neck in Snake Eyes. Charlie Kirk was shot in the side of the neck, according to video footage from the Utah Valley University event.
  • The Name of a Key Figure: The boxer who is set up to take the fall for the assassination in the movie is named Lincoln Tyler. In reality, the individual arrested in connection with Kirk's shooting is a 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson. The shared first name "Tyler" is cited as another link.
  • The Date: Some users claim the boxing match in the film occurs on September 10, the same date as Kirk's assassination. However, neither a direct screening of the movie nor an official source have verified this particular element.
  • The Trump Connection: The film features scenes shot at the Trump Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino, and a character named Gilbert Powell is reportedly based on Donald Trump, according to IMDb. Charlie Kirk was a prominent and vocal supporter of the former president.

How Are People Reacting to These Comparisons?

Online, the purported similarities have generated a variety of responses and fueled conspiracy theories. "Predictive Programming: How a 1998 Nicolas Cage Film Scripted the Death of Charlie Kirk" was one user's post. Another user remarked, “The coincidences in this movie are too many—like the Charlie Kirk murder. This can’t just be chance.” Another took it further: “There are no coincidences.”"Charlie Kirk was an inside job.” These reactions reflect a deep-seated suspicion and a search for patterns following a shocking event.

Also Read: Why Overconfident People Are More Likely to Believe Conspiracy Theories | Are You One?

What is the Official Stance and Reality?

It is crucial to note that there is no established link between the film and Charlie Kirk's assassination. Law enforcement has not indicated any connection, and the similarities appear to be a case of coincidences being amplified in an online echo chamber. 

The human brain's innate tendency to look for patterns, particularly during traumatic experiences, can cause people to make connections where none exist.

In a poignant contrast to the online speculation, Charlie Kirk's wife, Erika Kirk, who is now the CEO of Turning Point USA, spoke at her husband's memorial. In a powerful display of personal conviction, she stated that she had forgiven the alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson. This real-world response stands in stark opposition to the fictional narratives gaining traction online.

Prakriti Parul