A very tragic scene has emerged from the BMW crash in Delhi. Survivor Sandeep Kaur was given a last view of her husband, Navjot Singh, whose life was lost on Sunday, September 14, when a speeding BMW crashed into their scooter near Dhaula Kuan.
Navjot’s body was shifted to Venkateshwar Hospital after his post-mortem. Sandeep is undergoing treatment there. Overwhelmed with sorrow, she wept as she gazed at him for the last time.
WATCH:
VIDEO | Dhaula Kuan BMW accident case: Mortal remains of Navjot Singh brought to his residence.
He lost his life after a BMW allegedly hit his motorcycle near Delhi Cantonment metro station on Ring Road here on Sunday.
(Full video available on PTI Videos-… pic.twitter.com/xAFB2Gq6U0
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) September 16, 2025
After this emotional outburst, Navjot’s mortal remains were transported to his Hari Nagar home. A close family friend said, “Today is a very sad day. I have not only lost a friend, but also my dear brother. He stood with me in every moment of happiness and misery. The pain of this loss is unexplainable.”
ALSO READ: DELHI NEWS: BMW Crash Accused Tests Negative for Alcohol in Blood Report
The friend also revealed that the cremation took place on Navjot’s son’s 22nd birthday. “This makes it even worse. His family, his son, his father, all of them are in extreme distress,” he disclosed.
www Navnoor, the son of Navjot, recalled his parents as his dearest friends and spoke about the lovely time spent with them. Recently joining the workforce, he had decided to surprise them with gifts purchased from his first paycheck, he said to TOI.
ALSO READ: DELHI NEWS: Gift Navjot Ordered for Son’s Birthday Arrive Today, Says Friend
Navjot and Sandeep were on their way back from Bangla Sahib when the accident took place. The driver, 38-year-old Gaganpreet Kaur, was later arrested by police.
Her lawyer, senior advocate Vikas Pahwa, said that she was produced in front of a judge at her home and remanded to two days’ judicial custody after Duty Magistrate Akanksha Singh held that custodial interrogation was not necessary.
