• Home/
  • United States/
  • Vivek Ramaswamy Trolled for Barefoot Interview, Ignites Debate on Indian Culture

Vivek Ramaswamy Trolled for Barefoot Interview, Ignites Debate on Indian Culture

A resurfaced video of Vivek Ramaswamy giving a barefoot interview has triggered strong reactions. While critics call it "uncivilised," supporters defend his cultural background.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Vivek Ramaswamy Trolled for Barefoot Interview, Ignites Debate on Indian Culture

Vivek Ramaswamy, 39-year-old businessman and former U.S. presidential candidate, has again been in the eye of a social media storm. A video of him taking a barefoot interview at home has gone viral online, inviting a maelstrom of responses. While some have termed the move as “uncivilised” and “anti-American,” others have come to its defence as a common cultural practice.

The footage, taken on a live stream last year, has sparked debate among social media users, creating heated conversations on etiquette, cultural practices, and political opinion in America.

Critics Lampoon Barefoot Arrival of Vivek Ramaswamy

Most critics were upset with Ramaswamy’s choice to appear barefoot while speaking on camera. One user commented, “Vivek will never be governor of Ohio. This is unacceptable for America.” Another chimed in, “Maybe at least have some socks on while you interview for a position in the most powerful empire on the planet, yeah.”

A third critic went even further, questioning his credibility, “Vivek lectures us about education while barefoot. Uncivilised.”

Defenders of Cultural Practices

Still, many online users came to the defense of Ramaswamy, pointing out that taking off shoes inside is a common practice in most cultures, particularly South and East Asia.

One supporter pointed out, “Nearly all Indians go barefoot in their own homes. There’s nothing wrong with it. Just a cultural thing.” Another added, “In Indian tradition, it is customary to take off your shoes before entering someone’s home, considered a sign of respect and hygiene, as it prevents bringing dirt and germs from outside into the house; this practice is widely followed.”

Political commentator Kim Iversen also chimed in, lambasting those who refuse to take off their shoes indoors. “I understand this is a ‘culture’ thing, but you non-Asians wearing shoes in your homes need a culture shift.” She went on to say that at her house, not only are shoes prohibited, but socks are also frowned upon because of slipping on hardwood floors.

Ramaswamy Responds with Confidence

Amid the angry debate, Ramaswamy brushed aside the controversy with an unapologetic and sure declaration. “This is America, folks. I let the dogs out in my house when I feel like it,” he said.

His reaction drew admiration from certain conservatives, who applauded his skill in taking criticism with poise. One writer pointed out, “Vivek showed extreme class when Coulter stated flat out because of his race she would not vote for him. He kept the conversation going and never fell into an offended or victim mentality. Well done by him.”

Political Scrutiny or Cultural Differences?

The controversy surrounding Ramaswamy’s barefoot interview reflects the larger conversation on cultural expectations and norms within politics. While some see his decision as inappropriately modest for a public figure, others see it as an expression of personal preference and cultural heritage.

With reactions spanning in both directions on social media, one thing is clear—Vivek Ramaswamy is a master of sparking discussion and being a subject of public debate.