A Columbia University student, suspended for deploying a foul-smelling substance during a campus demonstration, has been awarded nearly $400,000 (₹3.3 crore) in a settlement with the Ivy League institution. The incident, which occurred during a pro-Palestine protest, involved the student spraying what was termed “fart spray” on demonstrators, leading to several individuals requiring medical attention.
The student, who identified as Israeli, claimed that his actions were intended as a “harmless expression of speech.” However, the aftermath was far from benign. Multiple protesters reported symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain, and headaches, with some requiring hospitalization due to “chemical exposure.” One affected Jewish student shared with the Guardian that they experienced “severe nausea and a headache” following the incident.
In response to the event, both the university and New York police classified the act as a “possible hate crime,” initiating an investigation. Columbia’s interim provost, Dennis Mitchell, communicated to students and faculty about the serious nature of the incident, emphasizing the need for a safe environment on campus.
Following his suspension from January to May, the student filed a lawsuit against Columbia University, resulting in the recent settlement. A report by Republican staff on a U.S. House committee criticized the university for what they deemed “disproportionate discipline,” highlighting a broader concern about the treatment of students expressing pro-Palestinian sentiments on elite campuses.
The Jewish student affected by the spray expressed their discontent with the settlement, labeling it a “slap in the face.” They stated, “Assault is assault. If multiple people have to go to the hospital and get diagnosed with chemical exposure, then, ‘Oh, it was just fart spray’ is not really a defense to me.”
This incident has reignited discussions about campus safety, freedom of expression, and the balance between protest and conduct in educational institutions. As universities grapple with these complex issues, the Columbia University case serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of demonstrations that escalate beyond intended expression.
