• HOME»
  • »
  • SC Agreed To Consider Early Listing Of Manish Sisodia’s Curative Petitions For Bail In Delhi Liquor Policy Scam

SC Agreed To Consider Early Listing Of Manish Sisodia’s Curative Petitions For Bail In Delhi Liquor Policy Scam

The Supreme Court in the case observed and has agreed to consider the urgent listing of the curative petition moved by Aam Aadmi Party, AAP leader and former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister, Manish Sisodia wherein seeking bail in the Delhi liquor policy scam case. The counsel, Senior Advocate Mr AM Singhvi, appearing for the former […]

Advertisement
SC Agreed To Consider Early Listing Of Manish Sisodia’s Curative Petitions For Bail In Delhi Liquor Policy Scam

The Supreme Court in the case observed and has agreed to consider the urgent listing of the curative petition moved by Aam Aadmi Party, AAP leader and former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister, Manish Sisodia wherein seeking bail in the Delhi liquor policy scam case.
The counsel, Senior Advocate Mr AM Singhvi, appearing for the former Deputy CM, submitted before Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud that the Trial Court has deferred the hearing of Sisodia’s fresh bail application wherein its is stated that the curative petition is pending before the Supreme Court.
The bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud in the case observed and has agreed to consider the matter and asked the petitioner to send an email request.
The said matter was previously mentioned by Singhvi on February 05, 2024 as well.
Therefore, the curative petition moved seeks bail for Sisodia in connection with the Delhi liquor policy scam, where he faces charges registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI and the Directorate of Enforcement, ED.
The bench comprising of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice SVN Bhatti in the case observed and has dismissed the petition moved by Manish Sisodia’s seeking bail in the CBI and ED cases related to the Delhi liquor policy scam.
The bench in the case observed and has denied the bail wherein stating that Sisodia will be entitled to apply for fresh bail if the trial does not progress in three months.
Accordingly, the same bench dismissed the review petition on December 13.

Tags:

Advertisement