AAP leader Prem Garg expressed admiration for the Supreme Court’s decision, stating that it marks a significant move in safeguarding the rights of both ruling and opposition parties. He emphasized that the electoral bond scheme placed all parties, except the ruling party, at a disadvantage, affecting even the general public.
Garg questioned the quid pro quo behind the Rs 5200 crore received by the BJP through electoral bonds, urging the State Bank of India (SBI) to disclose all relevant information publicly. The Aam Aadmi Party lauded the Supreme Court’s decision and demanded transparency regarding the contributors and amounts involved in this funding mechanism. Garg alleged that the Modi government introduced the scheme as a money bill to bypass discussion in the Rajya Sabha.
Furthermore, Garg criticised the ineffectiveness of the bond scheme in reducing cash transactions in politics, citing instances of large sums being seized in cash during elections. He asserted that the Electoral Bond Scheme served as a smokescreen for political parties, diverting attention from the reality of substantial cash transactions in the electoral process. Overall, Garg’s remarks underscore the need for transparency in political funding and skepticism about the effectiveness of the electoral bond system.