The Supreme Court in the case Raj Kumar Petitioner-In-Person versus Union Of India observed and has dismissed the PIL moved challenging the Darwinian theory of evolution and Einstien’s equation.
The bench comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia in the case observed and has stated that the petitioner wants to prove that Darwinian theory of evolution and Einstein’s equation are wrong and he wants a platform for the said purpose. If this being the belief, then he can propagate his own belief and this cannot be a writ plea moved under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, which has to deal with the issues of fundamental rights.
The petitioner appearing in person, argued before the court that I have studied in my school time and college time and today I say that whatever I studied was wrong.
Adding to it, Justice Kaul retorted that then you can improve the theory, what is the Supreme Court supposed to do. You say that you studied in school, you were the scientist student and now you say that those theories are wrong. The Supreme Court has nothing to do, if you believe that those theories were wrong. What being the violation of your fundamental right under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
Petitioner stated, where I should go?
Justice Kaul: This court do not have any advisory jurisdiction to tell you where you should go
Petitioner: I need to took the help of some lawyer…
Justice Kaul: Supreme Court will not say that you prove that Newton is wrong or Einstein is wrong. This is Article 32 petition. Who is the Counsel who has filed the petition?
Justice Kaul also added that you do your own theory and propound it. No difficulty. You need to feel that two theories existing for a long time are wrong…you propagate your own theory.
The petitioner in the case tried to convince the bench by stating that 20 million people have died accepting the Darwin’s theory. It has categorically been stated by Justice Kaul that these are not the adjudicated rights.
