NO ONE CAN BE FORCED TO TAKE COVID VACCINE, SAYS SC

The Supreme Court on Monday while saying that bodily autonomy and integrity are constitutional rights and no individual can be forced to get vaccinated against Covid-19, also affirmed the Central government’s Covid-19 vaccination policy.

A bench of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai also held that the vaccine mandates imposed by various state governments and other authorities in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic are “not proportionate”. Saying that restrictions on unvaccinated individuals in relation to public places and access to resources are unreasonable, the bench suggested the states remove such restrictions. The bench said it is satisfied that the current vaccine policy cannot be said to be unreasonable and manifestly arbitrary.

It further held that no substantial data has been produced on record by the Centre to show that the risk of transmission of Covid-19 virus from the unvaccinated persons is higher than from the vaccinated persons. The top court also directed the Centre to make public the data on the adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccination. On Covid-19 vaccination for children, the apex court said that it is not possible for it to second guess the opinion of experts and the vaccination indeed follows the global standards and practices.

The Supreme Court on Monday while saying that bodily autonomy and integrity are constitutional rights and no individual can be forced to get vaccinated against Covid-19, also affirmed the Central government’s Covid-19 vaccination policy.

A bench of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai also held that the vaccine mandates imposed by various state governments and other authorities in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic are “not proportionate”. Saying that restrictions on unvaccinated individuals in relation to public places and access to resources are unreasonable, the bench suggested the states remove such restrictions. The bench said it is satisfied that the current vaccine policy cannot be said to be unreasonable and manifestly arbitrary.

It further held that no substantial data has been produced on record by the Centre to show that the risk of transmission of Covid-19 virus from the unvaccinated persons is higher than from the vaccinated persons. The top court also directed the Centre to make public the data on the adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccination. On Covid-19 vaccination for children, the apex court said that it is not possible for it to second guess the opinion of experts and the vaccination indeed follows the global standards and practices.

Correspondent

Recent Posts

Sheikh Hasina ‘Escaped Death by Just 20-25 Minutes’, Reveals in Voice Note

Sheikh Hasina, the ousted Bangladesh prime minister, has shared a heartfelt voice note online recounting…

18 minutes ago

What is TikTok’s Worth, and Can it be Purchased in the US?

TikTok might face a U.S. ban due to national security concerns over its Chinese ownership.…

19 minutes ago

Selena and Benny Volunteer for Los Angeles Wildfire Relief, Fans Clash Over Justin Bieber’s Getaway

Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco joined wildfire relief efforts in LA, while fans clashed over…

24 minutes ago

Rs. 86,000 Dior Chappals: Man Gifts Luxury Footwear to His Mom

A man gifted his mom Rs. 86,000 Dior slides, sharing the heartfelt moment on Instagram.…

26 minutes ago

Rising Cesareans in the UK: Is It Hurting Mothers and Babies?

Over the past few years, the rise in cesarean section (C-section) births has been a…

39 minutes ago

Boosting Teen Mental Health Could Save the U.S. $52 Billion in 10 Years

Adolescent mental health is gaining attention not only as a vital public health issue but…

40 minutes ago