In a heated debate on X (formerly Twitter), Tesla CEO Elon Musk and former Indian IT Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar discussed the reliability of EVM. Musk questioned if the world should switch to paper voting due to risks of hacking. Musk’s concerns were sparked by reports of voting irregularities in Puerto Rico’s elections. “Fortunately, there was a paper trail to correct the vote tallies,” said US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Chandrasekhar responded, suggesting Musk’s comments implied digital hardware could not be secure. He offered to teach Musk how to build secure EVMs. “India’s EVMs are custom-designed and not connected to any network, making them secure,” he stated.
Congress MP Rahul Gandhi and Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav supported Musk’s concerns. Rahul Gandhi criticized EVMs as “black boxes” lacking transparency, potentially undermining democracy. Akhilesh Yadav echoed the call for ballot paper voting, citing global expert warnings on EVM tampering risks. Musk countered by saying, “Anything can be hacked,” to which Chandrasekhar agreed but clarified that theoretical hacking doesn’t equate to practical insecurity of EVMs.
The Supreme Court has upheld the Election Commission’s authority over EVMs, which the Commission claims are foolproof. EVMs in India are connected to a VVPAT (Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail) machine, allowing voters to verify their votes. But the debate continues as some European nations revert to ballot voting.
The political upheaval in Bangladesh that erupted with the ouster of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina…
JD Vance met with Chinese VP Han Zheng before the inauguration, covering topics such as…
Hours after the union government agreed to resume the talks with the farmers and scheduled…
The sixth and youngest child of Mohammad Aslam from Budhal village in Rajouri district succumbed…
TikTok's US services were restored after President-elect Trump promised to extend the app's availability while…
Iranian court sentences popular singer Tataloo to death for blasphemy after an appeal, reigniting concerns…