Legally Speaking

TELANGANA HIGH COURT: PLACE OF RESIDENCE OF THE ARBITRATOR WOULD NOT BE THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION

The High Court of Telangana in the case M/s S. Square Infra v. Garneni Chalapathi Rao observed and held that the place of residence of the arbitrator would not determine the seat of arbitration.

The Single bench comprising of Justice P. Sree Sudha observed and held that merely because an arbitrator residing in Hyderabad has been appointed, it does not mean that only the Courts at Hyderabad would have the jurisdiction to decide all the matters arising out of arbitration agreement.

Facts of the Case:

In the present case, after the dispute arouse between the parties, the respondent sent a letter to the petitioner for nomination an arbitrator who is residing in Hyderabad. To its said notice, petitioner replied and declined the appointment of the arbitrator for the reason that there was no dispute which required the appointment of an arbitrator.

A suit was filled by the respondent before the VII Additional District Judge Sangareddy, seeking for relief of permanent injunction. An application was filled by the petitioner under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act and the parties referred to the arbitration.

An application was filled by the respondent under section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act before the Principal District Judge, Sangareddy, Subsequently, an application was filled by the petitioner for transferring the application from the Court at Sangareddy to Court at Hyderabad.

Contentions made by Parties:

On the following grounds, the petitioner sought the transfer of application.

An arbitrator residing in Hyderabad was nominated to respondent. However, only the courts in Hyderabad would have the jurisdiction to decide all the matters arising out of the arbitration.

It was stated that the nomination of an arbitrator residing in Hyderabad amounted to designating Hyderabad as the Seat of Arbitration.

On the following grounds, the respondent countered the submissions of the petitioner:

An application was filled by the petitioner under Section 8 of the A&C Act before the Court at Sangareddy. However, in terms of Section 42 of the A&C Act, only the court at Sangareddy would have the jurisdiction to decide all the matters arising out of arbitration.

Court Analysis:

The Court held that the seat of arbitration would not be decide by the place of residence of the arbitrator.

The argument of the petitioner was rejected by the court that since the respondent had initially nominated an arbitrator residing in Hyderabad, the Hyderabad Court would have the jurisdiction.

The court stated that merely because a party has nominated an arbitrator who resides in Hyderabad, the same would not designate Hyderabad as the Seat of arbitration in absence of any designation of the seat under the arbitration agreement.

It was further stated by the court that the application filled by the petitioner filled under Section 8 application before the Court at Sangareddy consequent to which the parties were referred to arbitration. Therefore, the Court would have the jurisdiction, in terms of Section 42 of the A&C Act.

The Transfer petition was dismissed by the Court.

PRANSHI AGARWAL

Recent Posts

‘Terrible Entrepreneur’: Gaurav Taneja ‘Flying Beast’ Rs 1 Crore Pitch Gets Rejected On Shark Tank | WATCH

YouTuber Gaurav Taneja's BeastLife pitch on Shark Tank India faced rejection as Sharks questioned his…

6 minutes ago

US Rolls Out New H-1B Visa Rules to Boost Fairness and Efficiency

The U.S. has implemented new H-1B visa rules to improve fairness, reduce fraud, and streamline…

12 minutes ago

‘Someone, Please Explain The Maths!’: Zepto’s Billing Blunder, Reddit Reacts

A Reddit user called out Zepto's confusing billing breakdown, sparking online debate. Users mocked the…

18 minutes ago

Hostage Deal Signed, But Gaza Ceasefire Faces Internal Divisions

Prime Minister Netanyahu announced a deal to release hostages and pause the fighting in Gaza,…

35 minutes ago

Jessica Alba Reflects on 16 Year Marriage with Cash Warren in Emotional Post

Jessica Alba and Cash Warren are separating after 16 years of marriage, focusing on individual…

1 hour ago

Muslim Man Plucked Out Hair From His Private Parts And Throw It On ‘Tulsi Maa Chaura’ | VIRAL VIDEO

Outrage erupts after a disturbing video surfaces of a man caught on CCTV placing pubic…

1 hour ago