Legally Speaking

COURT CALLS FOR SENSITIZATION OF POLICE: DELHI RIOTS SITE PLANS PREPARED CASUALLY, S.65B CERTIFICATE NOT FILLED FOR DIGITALLY SOURCED EVIDENCE

The Court while dealing with a case related to 2020 Delhi riots, a city Court has called for sensitisation of investigating officers (IOs) on making the photos obtained from digital sources as admissible in evidence by filing a certificate under section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The bench comprising of Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala observed and thus ordered that whenever, photographs are filed from digital sources it is needless to say that a certificate under Section 65-B of I.E. Act, is must to make those photographs admissible for the purpose of evidence. However, all the IOs are required to be sensitized this respect as well and it is high time to control the casual and callous approach of any IO.

It was also observed that court expressed displeasure over “casually prepared site plans” by stating that preparation of the same were not even expected in cases triable by the Metropolitan Magistrates.

Adding to it, the Judge stated that unfortunately this kind of site plan has been filed in such a serious case involving session triable case. Moreover, from the documents filed on the record, the court find that certain photographs have been placed, but without any certificate under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act.

In the present case, the court was dealing with an FIR registered on the complaint of one Salim Khan wherein it was stated by him that his spare parts and barber shop shop was looted and was put on fire during riots.

It was admitted by one of the accused Dharmender that his involvement in the matter and he, with other co-accused was seen carrying the carton of Rooh Afzah from the warehouse of a complainant in another FIR.

The Court stated that a serious re-look over the quality of evidence/documents place on the record in the case, is required by senior officer with all serious attention.

Further, the court added that in this case the ld. DCP (North East) is requested to go through the records and to submit his report, if the prosecution is to be carried on, on the basis of other materials and same site plan as placed on the record.

As in future, the Special Public Prosecutor undertook to be much careful.

Accordingly, the Court listed the matter for further hearing on August 17.

PRANSHI AGARWAL

Recent Posts

Bolivian Judge Orders Arrest Of Former President Evo Morales Over Child Sexual Abuse

Evo Morales faces charges for allegedly abusing a teenage girl during his presidency. A judge…

12 minutes ago

Japan Reports Increased Probability of Megaquake: Over 80% in 30 Years

A megaquake is defined as an earthquake with a magnitude of 8 or greater, capable…

13 minutes ago

Half Of Boris Johnson’s UK Hospital Rebuild Plan Delayed For Years

UK’s hospital rebuild program, initially promised by Boris Johnson, is delayed, with half of the…

25 minutes ago

“Speaks Volumes”: Cancer Patient Reflects on Kate Middleton’s Hospital Visit

Kate later took to Instagram to share that her cancer was in remission.

27 minutes ago

CIA Employee Admits To Leaking Secret Israel-Iran Strike Plans, Faces Sentence

Asif William Rahman illegally shared secret information on Israel's plans to attack Iran. His actions…

32 minutes ago

Amazon Violence: Deadly Clashes Erupt Between Brazilian Police And Criminal Gangs, 11 Dead

Violence erupted in Porto Velho after a police officer's death, leading to retaliatory attacks by…

42 minutes ago