The J&K Students’ Association has announced its intention to file a petition against the Government’s decision to increase the reservation quota to 70%, citing concerns over what they term as “arbitrary reservation.”
Expressing their stance against the move, the Association, which claims to be the largest countrywide student network advocating for the safety, security, and welfare of J&K students, condemned the imposition of a 70% reservation quota, stating that it blatantly violates fundamental rights.
In a statement, the Association asserted, “We will file a petition against arbitrary reservation and blatant disregard for meritocracy and fair opportunities in the court. We seek the court’s intervention to stay the decision, which we deem unconstitutional. Merit must prevail for all students.”
Additionally, the Association revealed plans to address their concerns directly with J&K Lieutenant Governor and meet with concerned ministers and opposition leaders to seek redressal.
Clarifying their stance, the Association emphasized that their objection was not targeted against any specific community, region, religion, or faith. Rather, their concern lies in the fairness and balance within the reservation system.
While acknowledging support for the principle of reservation, the Association criticized the disproportionate allocation, stating that a 70% reservation over a 30% open merit ratio undermines the merit-based approach necessary for fostering equal opportunities and excellence.
The recent announcement by J&K authorities regarding a separate 10% reservation for Paharis and other tribes has also drawn criticism, particularly from open merit aspirants, who feel marginalized by the reduction of their quota to just 30%.
Reacting to the decision, aspirant Sahil Parray expressed discontent, labeling it as a “blatant disregard for meritocracy and fair opportunities,” and asserting that reducing open merit to 30% is a betrayal of the majority population. Amidst the controversy, former Mayor of Srinagar and J&K Apni Party member Junaid Mattu emerged as one of the few voices opposing the move. Mattu questioned the lack of advocacy for victims belonging to the Open Merit category, emphasizing the importance of upholding meritocracy in educational opportunities.
