Bengaluru: Supreme Court Judge P S Narasimha on Sunday stressed the importance of protecting India’s constitutional institutions from political interference. Delivering the Justice E S Venkataramiah Centennial Memorial Lecture, organized by the National Law School of India University, he underlined the significance of integrity, efficiency, and accountability in upholding democracy.
Justice Narasimha hailed Justice E S Venkataramiah, India’s 19th Chief Justice, as a judicial statesman whose legacy continues to inspire reforms in India’s constitutional framework.
Insulating Institutions from Political Influence
Justice Narasimha argued that the integrity of institutions can only be maintained through well-defined safeguards in the appointment, decision-making, and removal processes for their leadership.
He categorized institutions such as the Election Commission of India, Comptroller and Auditor General, and Information Commissions under the RTI Act as “integrity institutions” that require protection from external influence.
The Role of Fourth Branch Institutions
Justice Narasimha introduced the concept of Fourth Branch Institutions, which include bodies like the Election Commission and the Central Vigilance Commission. These institutions act as checks on the traditional three branches of government—executive, legislature, and judiciary.
He highlighted the foresight of India’s constitution-makers in establishing the Election Commission under Article 324, ensuring elections are conducted impartially outside the influence of the executive.
Ensuring Accountability and Transparency
Justice Narasimha praised the RTI Act for empowering citizens to access government information, enhancing accountability and transparency. He emphasized that independence from the government is critical for the functioning of such institutions.
“The Information Commissions under the RTI Act hold immense constitutional significance in ensuring transparency,” he stated.
Challenges Ahead for Democracy
Justice Narasimha also pointed out challenges that lie ahead for India’s constitutional democracy:
- Modernization Needs: Many institutions remain outdated in a rapidly digitizing world.
- Autonomy Issues: Structural reforms are required to ensure independence.
- Lack of Public Engagement: There is a need for more scholarship and discussions on public institutions.
Call to Action
The judge called for a sustained conversation on improving institutional frameworks and making them more resilient to political and social challenges. He concluded, “My attempt today was to kindle a serious discussion on how our institutions work—a conversation that must contribute to the actual working of our democratic Constitution.”
