Donald Trump's advisor Peter Navarro has been vocally critical of India's trade policies, supporting the imposition of tariffs. But he seems to continue his narrative to every direction he can think of, even if that makes no sense to us. (Photo: X/Peter Navarro)
Following the footsteps of his master POTUS Donald Trump, Peter Navarro has embarrassed himself, misfiring his words, talking too much and making less sense. The latest sample has been when US trade adviser Navarro charged India's richest business moguls, Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani, as "Brahmins profiteering off Indians." Navarro attributed this accusation to India's rise in importing subsidised Russian oil during the Ukraine war, stating that "Brahmins" were gaining disproportionately from this activity. These comments gained widespread attention and censure immediately for being cast-based in nature and factually incorrect.
Navarro's statement was factually incorrect as neither Gautam Adani nor Mukesh Ambani belong to Brahmin community by birth. The former hails from the Vaishya/Bania trading community and the latter from the Jain community. Historically, Brahmins in India have been linked with priestly and academic professions rather than commercial business. Fact-checkers and experts pointed out that equating the business elite with Brahmins is a perpetuation of stereotypes and misinformation, adding to social unrest.
ALSO READ | SCO: PM’s China visit beams Productive and Promising Talks
India's caste system runs deep and is complicated, with identity and status sensitivities. Navarro's statement struck a chord in these sensitivities, leading to political and social outrage. Indian politicians and commentators attacked the comments as divisive and disingenuous. The row also reopened debates about the use of caste in Indian politics, where caste-orientation is a staple of election and social engineering by different parties. Let's not be mistaken, the comment tries to explore the caste fault-lines aiming to divide India.
To understand better, let us look at this tweet-video by Professor Anand Ranganathan, Author, JNU Faculty and a political commentator.
The event revealed how global leaders occasionally tend to oversimplify or misrepresent India's complex social realities. Such misrepresentations have the potential to create misunderstandings as well as reinforce negative stereotypes on an international platform. The high visibility of business leaders such as Adani and Ambani means such statements can potentially influence India's business reputation globally and in diplomatic terms.
ALSO READ | Bihar SIR: Voter Enrolment Deadline Ends, Speculations Don’t!
Peter Navarro's comment calling India's richest entrepreneurs Brahmins profiteering was both wrongly stupid and socially divisive. It highlighted the need for careful, well-informed observation when making comments about cultural and social identities, especially in nations with intricate social compositions such as India.
The incident is a reminder of the ongoing delicacy around caste and the risk of reinforcing simplistic or bigoted assumptions within public life. But then his master sets an example for him to follow. So, if POTUS Trump isn't putting a leash on his lapdog, such misfires may result and at the end, they would end embarrassing themselves just like any other day in recent times.
