A recent article headlined “Marxist Dravidianism: A Troubled Legacy” in the RSS-affiliated Organiser magazine sparked a political uproar by suggesting a plot by a “Marxism embraced Abrahamics and Atheists nexus” against Sanatan Dharma.
The post by Amaranadha Reddy Manchuri also advises that qualified organisations like the Election Commission or NITI Aayog review political party manifestos.
Hindus in India and worldwide were disappointed by the DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin’s comments on Sanatan Dharma, which is the cause of the dispute. The essay suggests a logical screening method for political party manifestos and wonders whether the DMK’s 2021 election manifesto sought to appeal to Tamil Nadu’s Hindu population.The ‘Eradicate Sanatan Dharma 2023’ conference organized by a Marxist outfit has raised concerns, drawing parallels to a previous ‘Dismantling Global Hindutva’ conference in 2021, alleged to build an anti-Hindu narrative.
The article highlights Udhayanidhi’s statements, suggesting a synergy between Marxist forces and the DMK. It accuses the DMK of perpetuating Hindu hatred, citing historical anti-Hindu remarks by party leaders. The importance of temples in Tamil society is underscored, with criticism directed at government control over Hindu ashrams and temples, labelling it a colonial legacy.
The article points out that over 46,000 temples are under the control of the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department in Tamil Nadu.
It alleges that non-Hindu believers from Marxist, Atheistic, or Abrahamic backgrounds are being appointed, leading to disruptions in temple activities and concerns over devotees’ welfare and temple assets.
While the BJP seeks to capitalize on the issue, the DMK defends its stance, creating a polarized political environment. The call for screening political party manifestos adds another layer to the ongoing debate, raising questions about the role of competent authorities in ensuring fair and unbiased electoral practices.
