• HOME»
  • Business»
  • FSC Mauritius Refutes Hindenburg’s ‘Tax Haven’ Claims And Shell Company Allegations

FSC Mauritius Refutes Hindenburg’s ‘Tax Haven’ Claims And Shell Company Allegations

On Tuesday, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius addressed the recent allegations highlighted in the US short seller Hindenburg’s research report. The Mauritian regulator stated that Mauritius does not allow the formation of shell companies and rejects the characterisation of the country as a ‘Tax Haven’ as claimed by Hindenburg. The FSC serves as […]

Advertisement
FSC Mauritius Refutes Hindenburg’s ‘Tax Haven’ Claims And Shell Company Allegations

On Tuesday, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) of Mauritius addressed the recent allegations highlighted in the US short seller Hindenburg’s research report. The Mauritian regulator stated that Mauritius does not allow the formation of shell companies and rejects the characterisation of the country as a ‘Tax Haven’ as claimed by Hindenburg. The FSC serves as the unified regulator for the non-banking financial services sector and global business.

“FSC has taken cognizance of the contents of the report published by Hindenburg Research on 10 August 2024 wherein mention has been made of ‘Mauritius-based shell entities and Mauritius as a ‘tax haven’. The FSC wishes to highlight that the legislative framework in Mauritius does not permit creation of shell companies. Mauritius has a robust framework for global business companies,” a statement from FSC Mauritius read.

“All global business companies licensed by the FSC have to meet substance requirements on an ongoing basis as per section 71 of the Financial Services Act which is strictly monitored by the FSC. Moreover, the FSC wishes to highlight that Mauritius strictly complies with international best practices and has been rated as compliant with the standards of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”),” the statement added.

The Mauritian regulator also clarified that the fund ‘IPE Plus’ mentioned by the US short seller is not licensed by the FSC Mauritius.

“The report of Hindenburg has further cited ‘”IPE Plus Fund” Is A Small Offshore Mauritius Fund’ and ‘IPE Plus Fund 1, a fund registered in Mauritius’. We wish to clarify that IPE Plus Fund and IPE Plus Fund 1 are not licensees of the FSC and are not domiciled in Mauritius.”

In its report, Hindenburg alleged that “In one complex structure, a Vinod Adani-controlled company had invested in the “Global Dynamic Opportunities Fund” (“GDOF”) in Bermuda, a British overseas territory and tax haven, which then invested in IPE Plus Fund 1, a fund registered in Mauritius, another tax haven. The current SEBI Chairperson and her husband, Dhaval Buch, had hidden stakes in the exact same obscure offshore Bermuda and Mauritius funds, found in the same complex nested structure, used by Vinod Adani.”

In a joint statement, SEBI chairperson Madhabi Buch and her husband had said, “The investment in the fund referred to in the Hindenburg report was made in 2015 when they were both private citizens living in Singapore and almost two years before Madhabi joined SEBI, even as a Whole-Time Member. ”

On Tuesday, Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), a global index provider, announced that it will lift the freeze on Adani Group stocks, following the scrutiny stemming from Hindenburg Research allegations. Beginning with the August 2024 Index Review, MSCI will make adjustments, including updates to the Number of Shares (NOS), Foreign Inclusion Factor (FIF), and Domestic Inclusion Factor (DIF) for Adani Group and related securities.

 

Advertisement