Veteran Pakistani actor Tauqeer Nasir recently sparked controversy by alleging that Shah Rukh Khan’s character in the 2006 film ‘Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna’ closely resembled a character he portrayed in the Pakistani TV series ‘Parwaaz.’ Nasir, known for his nuanced performances, pointed out similarities such as a distinctive limp in both characters.
During an interview on the YouTube channel Zabardast with Wasi Shah, Nasir praised Khan’s acting but insisted that credit should have been acknowledged. He remarked, “There’s a film Shah Rukh did that was a direct copy of my character in ‘Parwaaz.’ They should have given credit, especially Karan Johar.”
Nasir elaborated on the emotional depth and choices faced by both characters, emphasizing that while ‘Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna’ presented these themes in a Bollywood style, the fundamental essence and character traits were drawn from his earlier work.
This controversy raises significant questions about artistic inspiration, adaptation, and the ethical responsibilities of filmmakers in acknowledging sources of influence. In the global entertainment industry, discussions over creative borrowing and recognition are commonplace, underscoring the importance of transparency in creative collaborations.
As of now, neither Karan Johar nor Shah Rukh Khan has responded publicly to Tauqeer Nasir’s claims. This debate serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in navigating artistic inspiration and recognition in a world of interconnected cinema, ensuring fair acknowledgment for all contributors to the creative process.
