A public hearing began on Monday to discuss a bill that would change the principles of New Zealand’s founding treaty. The proposed bill has faced strong criticism. Many believe it is unconstitutional and harmful to Māori rights.
The Treaty Principles Bill
The Treaty Principles Bill was introduced by the Act party. It seeks to replace long-standing principles that guide the relationship between Māori and the Crown. The Act party argues that Māori have received special rights due to the Treaty of Waitangi.
Backlash from Lawyers and Academics
The bill has sparked backlash from lawyers, academics, and the public. Critics argue it will weaken Māori rights. Many fear it will remove important checks on government power. Māori leaders have held large meetings in protest.
Sir Edward Durie’s Warning
Sir Edward Taihakurei Durie, a former high court judge, strongly opposed the bill. He said it would undo 50 years of work done by the Waitangi Tribunal. He warned that the government would be ridiculed by the international community if the bill passes.
Christopher Finlayson’s Critique
Christopher Finlayson, former National party minister, also criticized the bill. He called it “misconceived” and argued it does not reflect the true relationship between the Crown and Māori.
Act Party’s Defence
Act leader David Seymour defended the bill. He said the current treaty principles have caused unequal rights. Seymour argued that dividing people by race is racism and claimed the bill would prevent New Zealand from becoming a totalitarian state.
Experts Voice Concerns
Political scientist Dr. Bronwyn Hayward warned that the bill’s rhetoric was dangerous. She said it would divide the country and stir anger. Dame Marilyn Waring warned that the bill would reverse progress for Māori. Dr. Areti Metuamate criticized the bill for lacking consultation with Māori communities.
Public Reaction
The bill has received historic public attention. Over 300,000 submissions have been made, setting a new record in New Zealand. The bill is unlikely to pass at the second reading due to lack of support. The justice committee will hear 80 hours of public submissions. A report on the bill is due by May 14.
